-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 925
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(header/p2p): implement GetVerifiedRangeByHeight #1305
feat(header/p2p): implement GetVerifiedRangeByHeight #1305
Conversation
1e0c0ea
to
53d9e8b
Compare
53d9e8b
to
cdcb176
Compare
cdcb176
to
898cb10
Compare
725069d
to
78e5373
Compare
78e5373
to
ef025cb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, module Adjacent verification.
@vgonkivs and I discussed in sync how to proceed with this work. Once we merge it, Slava will continue working on Verified implementation with retries and penalties. Then we will migrate Syncer over the Verified range and then deprecate the regular GetRange
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1305 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 55.35% 55.87% +0.51%
==========================================
Files 182 186 +4
Lines 11072 11463 +391
==========================================
+ Hits 6129 6405 +276
- Misses 4328 4429 +101
- Partials 615 629 +14
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we going to get a follow-up PR that will use GetVerifiedRange
in place of GetRange
at some point? (in the syncer, for example)
@renaynay, check the top comment on my previous review to answer the your question |
ack @Wondertan |
Co-authored-by: rene <41963722+renaynay@users.noreply.github.com>
8349240
to
4c8ab1a
Compare
4c8ab1a
to
9669a31
Compare
Resolves: